Finding Evidence in Holistic Graduate Admissions
A growing body of research suggests that traditional, evaluative metrics like standardized test scores, GPAs, and letters of recommendation do not accurately predict completion rates. Relying on these can, more over, invite bias into the admissions process and exacerbate inequity. Departments should consider letters, GPAs and test scores carefully, and might wish to think of them in relation to socio-emotional variables that track more closely with graduate student success.
- Sedlacek, William (2017). Measuring Noncognitive Variables: Improving Admissions, Success and Retention for Underrepresented Students. Herndon, VA: Stylus Publishing.
- Miller, C., Stassun, K. A test that fails. Nature 510,303–304 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7504-303a
- Warden, David N; Myers, Charlsie A. Nonintellective Variables and Nontraditional College Students: A Domain-Based Investigation of Academic Achievement College Student Journal, v51 n3 p380-390 Fall 2017 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1152787
- Rojstaczer, Stuart.GradeInflation.com: Grade Inflation at American Colleges and Universities. https://gradeinflation.com/
- Akos, P., & Kretchmar, J. (2016). Gender and ethnic bias in letters of recommendation: Considerations for school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 20(1), 102-113.https://doi.org/10.5330/1096-2409-20.1.102
- Letters of Recommendation: How to Write, Read and Solicit Letters for Equity